Skip to main content
Use this when you need to verify a document against a reference — regulations, writing guidelines, public notices, standard terms — and surface anything that violates the rules or is missing.

​
Typical Scenarios

  • Contract and terms review — checking against internal contract guidelines or related regulations
  • Pre-submission review for proposals and plans — validating against a public notice’s evaluation criteria and submission requirements
  • Operations manual revisions — comparing against the latest revised laws or internal policies to spot what needs updating
  • Compliance review — ensuring reports and presentations don’t violate privacy, security, or disclosure rules

​
Example Questions

"Compare this contract draft against our standard guidelines and flag missing or conflicting clauses"
"Check this business plan against the RFP evaluation criteria and point out any unmet requirements"
"Show where this operations manual diverges from the latest revised guidelines"
"Review this IR deck for wording that conflicts with disclosure rules"

​
Tips for a More Accurate Check

  • Tag both the target and reference with @ — making the scope explicit sharpens the result.
  • Name the angle — “missing items,” “conflicting clauses,” “terminology inconsistencies” — state the lens you want applied.
  • Ask for a usable format — a table, page references, or a priority ranking makes the output directly actionable.
The Quick Action buttons below the chat input include a cross-check flow. Pick the target and reference documents, and Wissly assembles a well-formed request for you.

Requesting Comparative Analysis

Compare documents at the metric or line-item level.

Writing with the Canvas

Act on the check results and revise the draft.